Please let us keep in mind the offer as well as the value proposal to the publishers to use a site like GAOTD. Something like: simplify the registration process, change the color scheme, add the ability to export to., etc. Many times I see software thumbed down because the reviewer does require the software or it see it as necessary. Additionally, improvements should be recommended that would provide the software with a better bang-for-buck ratio. My understanding is that the publishers require the software to be assessed and evaluated. I enjoy the freeware recommendations and find them very valuable as well. The fact is that we have full functionality of a commercial product at no cost. The publishers of the Software offers on GOATD provide us with software (sometimes for life, other times for a period only). I would like to raise something that has been a concern for a while. It might also be that my understanding for the whole GAOTD concept is flawed. It is just something I felt that should be mentioned. Please note: this is not written because of any specific review or comment that has been made, nor is it directed at anyone in particular. I write this piece because I also dabble in programming from time to time and appreciate criticism that would enable me to improve and maybe even distinct my software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |